Below is a global e-mail received from an unknown source.
You must ascertain whether it is genuine or not and whether the current Labour Government’s global ‘credibility’ on being other than ‘open, accountable & transparent’ lends itself open to such scathing attacks & criticism?
Definition of suzerainty:
Even if it is a ‘made up letter’ – it certainly makes one think how successive governments in the UK would not have missed the opportunities to (not aid but) raid the vulnerable cultures both during the imperial times and the modern ‘exploitative’ times.
The Government gives an international impression of ‘writing off’ billions of pounds worth of debt on one hand whilst surreptitiously taking the ‘P***’ out of poverty and unethical politics with the other. You figure it out for yourself.
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;>
Subject: Museveni’s letter to the British…
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:40:48 -0800

In a biting letter to Hilary Benn, British Secretary of State for Development Corporation, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni lays into an aid system that continues to hold African countries captive to a ‘beggar’ relationship. Business in Africa publishes the full text.



Right Honourable Hilary Benn

I have received your letter of 21st March, 2005 in which you say that you will withhold some amount of money that you had promised to us  following a "governance assessment" after your High Commissioner’s  meeting with our Ministers, including our Prime Minister.

Rt. Honourable Benn, I want you to know that I have a real problem  with this paternalistic arrangement of the so-called "donor" and "beggar"  relationship. As I told the G-8 Group in Sea Island, where your Prime Minister, Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, was present, the real "donors" to the Western countries are the Africans who sell their unprocessed coffee, cotton, leather, gold, etc at 10 percent of their supermarket value.

In other words, in every kilogram of coffee, we donate, at least, US$9 to Western countries, including Britain, which hosts the Nestle factories that use coffee of the backward countries to generate money and employment for your people.

It is not entirely the fault of the former imperialist countries that backward states like Uganda were colonised. It is also the fault of  our Chiefs who so divided our people that they could not defend our sovereignty.It is also the fault of many of the post-independence  leaders of Africa that have failed to transform our economies and end Africa’s balkanisation in order to create power blocks on our continent with global influence when it comes to our legitimate interests.

What I find unacceptable, however, is for some of you to continue to think (and, even say) that because of the modest sums you give a country like Uganda, you are entitled to exercise suzerainty over our sovereignty issues (foreign affairs, politics and defence) – our persistent but polite rejection of that position (notwithstanding)

When we met in Bombo last, I told you that much as we may need some aid in the short run, support will not be productive if we do not insist on our independence in decision-making. If we continue accepting positions we know are wrong, we would be committing other people’s mistakes in our names. I must have told you, then, that if dependence and subservience were to be factors in development, then Black Africa should be the most developed part of the globe since we have had the greatest dosages of that  debasement (slave trade, colonialism, etc.). Point out one single  Black African country that has transitioned because of "aid" from the West in the last 48  years since Ghana’s independence in 1957.

I have always felt that we should put the nasty history of the relationship between Europe and Africa behind us. I have, however, told all of you repeatedly that, "trade, not aid will develop Africa". I was most pleased when the USA presidents, H.E. Bill Clinton and H.E. George  Bush, working with our supporters in the USA (the Black Caucus, Senator Bill Frist, etc.), finally promulgated the AGOA law. I have described that law as the greatest act of solidarity between Africa and the West in the last 500 years.

This is not an extravagant statement. The EBA of the EU is also a good initiative. You refer to the 800 million British pounds that you have contributed to Uganda’s recovery since 1986. Thank you very much. You need to  know, however, that on account of the decline of coffee bean (raw material form) prices, Uganda has had a cumulative loss of US$16bn in coffee export earnings alone. In 1986, when our export crop was 2 million bags, we earned US$ 500mn. Our export crop is now 4 million bags. But we are earning only $100mn. I am here talking of coffee beans (raw materials). I am not talking of unprocessed coffee, which, at the minimum, earns ten times the value  of the raw materials at the supermarket stage.

Who is impeding the industrialisation process in Uganda? The meddling by donors is part of the problem. They interfered with our counter-terrorism effort by constraining our modest defence expenditure, they forced us to scrap tax holidays on which we had agreed with them before, they constrained, if not banished altogether, our State’s possible intervention to kick-start the  industrial enterprises and yet foreign investors have now the whole globe open to them. They interfered with our energy development by forcing us to sequence the construction of dams rather than our  preferred option of building two dams simultaneously.

You talk of "governance assessment" after your High Commissioner meeting with our ministers, which resulted in the arrogant statement by your High Commissioner: "The beggar has not qualified for his next meal". Did our ministers endorse this assessment? Obviously not. It is therefore your unilateral assessment of us. Who assesses your performance in the UK?

What rights do the British have to assess governance in Uganda? You were here for 70 years as colonialists, the first very poorly organised general elections was in 1961. Idi Amin, the monster that caused so much damage to Uganda after almost 70 years of using our people in imperialist adventures, was among the first two Ugandans to go for junior army  training in 1958. What, then, gives credence to your position of assessor?

Right Honourable, I have tried in the past to be polite (obufura). It seems, however, politeness is not well understood in the West. In fact some of the words do not exist in our languages.

Since you are spending British tax payers’ money, you are of course entitled to know that the money is not stolen by the officials of the recipient country. That is why I do not mind discussing with you corruption issues, either privately or in public. Extra-judicial killings by state officials would also not be acceptable to any civilised community. If I had aid, I would not extend it to such a  government. A government that does not practice democracy by having regular elections on the basis of universal adult suffrage by secret ballot would not merit my support if I had aid to give. Economic management, leading to inflation, would not endear an aid recipient to me.

Beyond those four reference points, I would not be wise to interfere in the internal affairs of other people. One of the American politicians almost got into trouble on account of a rumour that his campaign had received a donation from the government of China. It is not correct to interfere in the internal affairs of other people. What would you say if I were to  fund the Conservative Party candidates in your elections using financial support. Would they be representing the British people or my interests?

Yes, governance can influence development. The question is: who is qualified to judge what is or is not good governance? Does a freedom fighter  like myself have the ability to know what good governance is or is it a monopoly of British Ministers and the British High Commissioner in Kampala?

Since you are in the habit of cutting off aid after your unilateral assessment, why don’t you cut off aid for our delay in adding value  to coffee, cotton, beef, milk, cereals, gold, cobalt, etc? This is the real bad governance; leaders continue donating the wealth of Africa to outsiders while people are wallowing in poverty without employment etc. Why do your conditionalities for aid not include chastising leaders who are so myopic that they do not see the fallacy of only exporting raw materials?

Our Movement has never made a strategic mistake in the last 35 years. We have made some tactical mistakes mainly because of the pressure of others. We always recover from those mistakes. If we made a tactical mistake in thinking that countries like Britain were interested in a new relationship with African countries based on partnerships rather than suzerainty, then it is time to review that relationship. What Uganda and Africa need most is independence in decision-making, not subservience or a satellite or dependency status.


 Yoweri Kaguta Museveni


  30th May, 2005,


Filed under Déjà vu?


  1. evencastles

    Greetings from Shanghai.

  2. Max

    Dear sir/Madam,
                            As some one who lived in uganda from 1973 to 1998 when  i was forced to leave the only home i knew,i find the above letter very unsettling,the britsh goverment may have a lot of short comings,they are not perfect in any way but al least UK has some form of democracy and fairness compared to Uganda,it is true that under the NRM,Uganda has developed so well that i have to give the devil his due,but when H.E. M7 decided to cook the books and give himself a 3rd term i then i knew that this is the begining of the end of a country&People i have always loved,I for one cannot beleive that museveni&Co. could pull such an illegal stunt!and as for his ‘letter’ we all know that he is a fantastic orator but then again so was hitler&other monolithic dictors,all iwe can do now is to pray for uganda and its people.

  3. Anant M

    Salaam Alaikum
    I am deeply touched that of all the blogs and off the entries you chose one of mine to trawl through and find a relevant one to your experience to comment on?
    Merhabba. What can I say?
    You are right. We hope and pray that Uganda will return gradually to its formal beauty and eminence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s